Recall for canned corn for glass parts

Recall for canned corn for glass parts

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Contamination from glass parts: wholesaler calls back canned corn

Eurogast Österreich GmbH has started a recall for canned corn. Glass parts could be in the product. Consumers are asked not to consume the product concerned.

Possible contamination from glass parts

The wholesaler for gastronomy, hotels and commercial kitchens, Eurogast Austria, is calling back canned corn because a quality control “has identified a possible contamination from glass parts,” as the company wrote in a message. The recall is the product "Crunchy young sweet corn" of the brand Eurogast, filling weight 2120 g, drained weight 1775 g, batch: Best before 31.12.2021.K198 20:13.

Goods should not be consumed

The company advises that the affected product has been removed from the shelves.

"Customers are asked not to consume this product," says the message.

And: "All customers who have already bought one of the potentially affected products should contact their Eurogast partner immediately, the corn will be replaced free of charge."

Splinters of glass can cause serious injury

Food that could contain broken glass or broken glass should in principle no longer be consumed.

These can lead to serious injuries in the mouth and throat or to internal injuries.

In food production, defects in the manufacturing processes can lead to contamination or foreign bodies such as glass, aluminum or plastic residues. (ad)

Author and source information

This text corresponds to the requirements of the medical literature, medical guidelines and current studies and has been checked by medical doctors.


  • Eurogast Austria: recall from preventive consumer protection Eurogast sweetcorn: (retrieval: 22.06. 2019)

Video: Ha-Joon Chang: Economics: The Users Guide. Talks at Google (July 2022).


  1. Jake

    It seems to read carefully but I don't understand

  2. Cowen

    Between us speaking, in my opinion, it is obvious. I have found the answer to your question in

  3. Tygosho

    I apologise, but it not absolutely that is necessary for me. There are other variants?

  4. Arashiran

    I think you have misled.

  5. Iapetus

    I am finite, I apologize, but it all doesn’t come close. Are there other variants?

Write a message