Many sensitive sunscreens are hardly recommendable according to the Öko-Test

Many sensitive sunscreens are hardly recommendable according to the Öko-Test

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Eco test for sensitive sunscreen: Four out of five products are not recommended

Sun cream is supposed to protect the skin from the negative effects of the sun's rays, which is especially important after the months with little sun. However, not all available sunscreens offer adequate protection and there are also possible risks from critical ingredients. “Öko-Test” has now examined 20 sunscreens for sensitive skin, only four of which are recommended.

The sun is intended to protect the skin from sunburn, skin aging and skin cancer. However, not every remedy is equally suitable for this. People also have different protection needs depending on their skin type. Light skin types in particular, whose skin is also sensitive, need special sensitive sunscreens. “Öko-Test” has now taken a closer look at 20 of these products with a sun protection factor of at least 30. The result is sobering.

Sunburn after just a few minutes

Especially on the first summer days of the year, many people neglect sun protection and get sunburned immediately. With every sunburn the risk of skin cancer increases and at the same time the skin ages much faster with neglected sun protection. Light skin types in particular can be burned after just a few minutes in the sun. You are therefore dependent on sunscreens with a high sun protection factor. However, some people have sensitive skin. They need so-called sensitive sunscreens that do not contain critical skin-irritating ingredients.

Sensitive sunscreen for sensitive skin

Allergy sufferers in particular, people with sun allergies or so-called Mallorca acne often have difficulty finding a compatible sunscreen. The sensitive variants are intended to remedy this, but many do not keep what they promise. According to the "Öko-Test", there were no allergy-causing preservatives or allergenic fragrances in the products tested, "but almost three-quarters of the sun creams contain questionable UV filters that are suspected of having a hormonal effect." Furthermore, "the use of Polyethylene glycols and / or chemical relatives (PEG), paraffins, silicones, and other problematic plastics “to complain about in some products.

Harmful chemical UV filters

For example, according to the "Öko-Test" for the chemical UVB filter ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, there are clear indications of a hormone effect. Science also assumes that “UV filters such as ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate are partly responsible for coral death” because they end up in the ocean when bathing. This filter was included in the products "Daylong Cetaphil Sun Sensitive Gel Cream" and in the "Lancaster Sun Sensitive Tender Soothing Sun Milk 50".

Also cheap sunscreen with high quality

In total, two sensitive sunscreens achieved the rating "very good" and one scored "good". The latter was the “Ombra Sun” sunscreen, which, at € 4.95, was one of the most affordable products. One of the test winners from the field of natural cosmetics was the “Eco Cosmetics Sun Milk”. The six worst products also included particularly expensive products, such as the "Lancaster Sun Sensitive Sun Milk" mentioned above for 47.98 euros per pack. This shows that the price is by no means an indication of good quality.

Sun protection factor has not been checked

The test did not check "whether the creams comply with the specified sun protection factors", since the recognized test method provides for causing sunburns on humans and, in addition, the protection factor in practice strongly depends on how much cream is used and at what intervals "Eco test". (fp)

Author and source information

Video: Stay Younger, Longer - The Lowdown on Sunscreen (May 2022).